|
| File type |
Download |
Size |
Language |
.jpg
|
Download |
208 kb
|
- |
Use constraints
Using this graphic and referring to it is encouraged, and please use it in presentations, web pages, newspapers, blogs and reports. For any form of publication, please include the link to this page and give the cartographer/designer credit (in this case UNEP/GRID-Arendal)
Source(s)
Philippe Rekacewicz, Atlas Environnement du Monde Diplomatique 2007, using the following as primary sources.
Field reporting: Philippe Rekacewicz and Ieva Rucevska, 2002, 2003 and 2004; ENVSEC Environment and Security Initiative; Michael Glantz et al., Water, Climate, and Development Issues in the Amudarya Basin, Informal Planning Meeting, June 2002; The Franklin Institute, Philadelphie, Pennsylvania; Addressing Environmental Risks in Central Asia, Risks, Conditions, Policies, Capacities, UNDP, Bratislava, 2003; United Nations Children's Fund, TransMONEE database (www.unicef-irc.org/databases/transmonee); The Road to Stability and Prosperity in South Eastern Europe, Regional Strategy Paper, World Bank, 2000; Europe and Central Asia Region, Transition - The First Ten Years: Analysis and Lessons for Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, World Bank, 2002; Kenley Butler, Weapons of Mass Destruction in Central Asia, Nuclear Threat Initiative, 2002.
|
Uploaded on Thursday 16 Feb 2012
by GRID-Arendal
Nuclear energy is not a clean alternative The legacy of the Soviet Union's nuclear activities
Year:
2009
Author:
UNEP/GRID-Arendal
Description:
Even though the nuclear industry does not significantly contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, it is a disputable alternative to fossil fuels.
In the former USSR people and the environment still have to cope with the nuclear industry’s legacy.
Views:
81
Downloads: 24
Rating: 
|
