Home >> Pro-poor growth and natural resources – the economic ... >> Household income by source, Masvingo province, Zimbabwe
File type Download Size Language
.png .png Download 57 kb -
.pdf .pdf Download 181 kb -
.jpg .jpg Download 84 kb -
Uploaded on Tuesday 21 Feb 2012 by GRID-Arendal

Household income by source, Masvingo province, Zimbabwe

Year: 2006 Author: Hugo Ahlenius, UNEP/GRID-Arendal
A study of households (rich and poor) in the Masvingo Province in southeastern Zimbabwe provides a good example of how agricultural income complements wild income and how it compares with other income sources such as wages and remittances. Agricultural income—from crops and home gardens—contributed 30 percent of total household income (cash and subsistence income combined). Livestock rearing—a modified form of agriculture that relies on wild forage—contributed another 21 percent. Wild products from woodlands contributed 15 percent. Together, these elements of environmental income sum to 66 percent of total income. In other words, goods and services from ecosystems contribute twothirds of family incomes in rural Zimbabwe. The remaining 34 percent came from wage labor, income from home industries, and remittances. For the poorest of these rural households, dependence on these different kinds of environmental income is even higher, providing a full 70 percent of total income when combined.
Views: 907     Downloads: 287     Rating: 2
Pro-poor growth, absolute and relative definition
Government revenues from diamond exports in Sierra Leone
Water requirements for food production 1960-2050
Number of people in the mining sector in selected countries in Sub-Saharan Africa
Employment in the travel and tourism industry in Africa
Export of fisheries products in Africa
Uganda: quantifying the importance of environment and natural resources
Contribution of forest to GDP, and ratio of forest exports out of total exports, for selected countries