Using this graphic and referring to it is encouraged, and please use it in presentations, web pages, newspapers, blogs and reports.
For any form of publication, please include the link to this page and give the cartographer/designer credit (in this case Riccardo Pravettoni)
Rees, H.G., and Collins, D., N., Regional differences in response of flow in glacier-fed Himalayan rivers to climatic warming, Hydrological Processes, 20, 2157–2169, 2006.
Uploaded on Friday 03 Feb 2012
Glacier shrinkage in hypothetical river basins
Downstream variation in the impact of glacier recession is
illustrated in Figure 5, which shows modelled river fows for
idealized catchments under climates representative of the
western and eastern Himalaya and a 0.06º C per year warming scenario. In the upper parts of the river basins, where
glaciers occupy 95% of the catchment area, the impact of glacier shrinkage is large. River discharges increase until mid-century, after which they decline to a base level equal to the
annual precipitation totals. When larger catchments are con-
sidered, the percentage glacierized area is smaller, and the impact of glacier shrinkage is much reduced. For modelled catchments with an area of 5,000 square km and 1% glacier cover, the impact of deglaciation is barely detectable in the ‘eastern’ area, where there is high monsoon precipitation insummer. The effect is more signifcant in the ‘western’ area with its dry summer, but the downstream decrease in impact is still clearly evident.