HomeAboutActivitiesMapsPhotosPublicationsNews
 
Home >> Environment and Poverty Times #5: Pro-poor growth issue >> Forest vs. Agriculture – the case of the Mabira forest reserve, Uganda
File type Download Size Language
.jpg .jpg Download 35 kb -
.pdf .pdf Download 256 kb -
.png .png Download 53 kb -
Uploaded on Tuesday 21 Feb 2012 by GRID-Arendal

Forest vs. Agriculture – the case of the Mabira forest reserve, Uganda

Year: 2008 Author: Hugo Ahlenius, UNEP/GRID-Arendal
Description:
The Mabira forest reserve, on the shores of Lake Victoria hosts valuable wildlife, serves as a timber resource, provides ecosystem services for the water balance and the rainforests represents a tourist destination. Following a proposed plan for clearing a third of the reserve for agricultural use, the values of the forest were calculated by local researchers. This economic evaluation of the forest shows that from a short-term perspective, growing sugarcane would lead to more economic benefits than maintaining the forest reserve, with a return of 3.6 million USD/year in contrast to 1.1 million USD/year for conservation. However, sugar cane production is only optimal during a short time span - five years. When comparing both land use alternatives over the lifetime of the timber stock – 60 years, the benefits from the forest, and the ecosystem services it provides, exceed those of the sugarcane planting.
Views: 570     Downloads: 324     Rating: 2
Natural resource - water (freshwater run-off)
Natural resources - agricultural potential
Projected agriculture in 2080 due to climate change
World poverty distribution
The importance of small forestry enterprises in developing countries
Financial flows for developing countries
Trade in illegal wood products and corruption
Natural resources for pro-poor economic growth