| Key to charts |
 |
 |
It is no easy matter to generalize about environmental
implications of the scenarios for a region as large and varied as Asia and
the Pacific. It contains the two most populated countries in the world,
India and China, as well as oceanic island nations and the land-locked states
of the former Asian republics of the Soviet Union. It includes some of the
poorest nations of the world, some of the most dynamic economies of recent
times and several industrially advanced OECD countries.
The future of the environment in the region depends on a number of currently
unanswered questions. Can the region recover from the recession of the
late 1990s, as all the scenarios apart from Security First presume?
How are pressures of continued population and urban growth handled - in
a relatively hands-off manner as in Markets First and Security
First, or with more hands-on planning and consideration as in Policy
First and Sustainability First? How does technological development
fare, especially in relation to the provision of energy? Do abundant coal
resources dominate energy production as in the worlds of Markets First
and Security First? How do national, regional and international
governance structures develop and regional and international trade regimes
evolve?
The specific themes of land, forests, freshwater, urban issues and biodiversity
are addressed in more detail and at the sub-regional level in the remainder
of this section. The potential impacts of a dramatic decline in the availability
of clean freshwater are explored in the box.
| Key to charts |
 |
 |
Growing populations, the spread of agriculture
and climatic changes imply that the risk of land degradation increases
in many parts of the region in all scenarios (see chart above). Of particular
concern are loss of soil fertility and soil erosion in mountainous areas,
which increase downstream sedimentation. The oceanic sub-regions - the
South Pacific and Australia and New Zealand - are the least threatened
and South and Southeast Asia the most affected. The effect of more rapid
climate change in the Policy First and Sustainability First
scenarios implies somewhat higher risk than might be expected, but
as the rate of change slows in the longer term compared with Markets
First and Security First conditions, other effects predominate.
Measures taken in Policy First and Sustainability First scenarios
to improve agricultural practices limit the actual amount of degradation,
at least on croplands (see chart above). These policies include improvements
in land tenure systems and regional cooperation in managing erosion, particularly
on steep slopes. In addition, some degraded land is restored. Cropland
damage is exacerbated in a Security First world, where there is
greater reliance on uncontrolled use of chemical fertilizers and less
regional and international cooperation. Such agriculture practices decline
in the world of Markets First, but the sheer volume of economic
growth and associated demand leads to degradation as great as in Security
First.
|