|
The rapid global warming caused by human-induced changes
in the atmosphere that is projected by the IPCC would have dramatic effects
on the ocean (IPCC 2001), threatening valuable coastal ecosystems and the
economic sectors that depend upon them. Other potential impacts are complex
and poorly understood. Polar warming, and melting of the ice caps, could
slow down the global atmosphere/ocean 'heat engine', potentially altering
the flow of major ocean currents (Broecker 1997). The warming of the ocean's
surface layers, and an increased input of fresh water, could reduce the
upwelling of nutrients that supports much of the ocean's productivity. On
the other hand, the highly productive upwelling on the eastern side of some
oceans could intensify if, as some projections predict, relatively greater
warming occurs there (Bakun 1996). The IPCC predicts that storms and other
extreme weather events will increase in frequency and intensity (IPCC 2001),
increasing natural disturbances to coastal ecosystems and perhaps reducing
their ability to recover.
There is particular concern about the possible effects of global warming
on coral reefs. During the intense El Niņo of 1997-98, extensive coral
bleaching occurred on coral reefs worldwide (Wilkinson 1998, Wilkinson
and others 1999). While some reefs quickly recovered, others, particularly
in the Indian Ocean, Southeast Asia and the far western Pacific, suffered
significant mortality, in some cases more than 90 per cent (Wilkinson
1998, 2000).
Some models predict a long-term shift to an increased frequency and intensity
of El Niņo events or similar conditions. If this occurs, bleaching could
also become more frequent and intense, with irreversible damage to reefs.
There is evidence that a long-term decline of reefs in the remote Chagos
archipelago in the Indian Ocean is related both to El Niņo events and to
a long-term rise in surface temperature (Sheppard 1999). Mass bleaching
of reefs in various parts of the world was also observed in 2000, a possible
sign that bleaching is becoming more frequent. Reefs may also be threatened
by a higher concentration of CO2 in seawater which impairs the
deposition of their limestone skeletons.
Proposed protection measures to address a sealevel rise caused by climate
change have shifted away from solid constructions such as seawalls in
favour of a mix of soft protection measures (such as beach nourishment
and wetland creation), adaptive planning (such as new building codes),
and managed retreat, including cessation of new coastal construction (IPCC
2001). Some proposals to address global climate change are themselves
a cause for concern, particularly those to short-circuit the natural transfer
of CO2 from the atmosphere to the ocean by fertilizing large
areas of the ocean surface with nitrogen or iron to enhance phytoplankton
growth, or to inject CO2 directly into deep waters. The effects
of these large-scale measures cannot be predicted but are potentially
enormous.
Small island developing states (SIDS) and lowlying coastal areas are
particularly vulnerable to the effects of rising sea levels and more extreme
weather. Furthermore, they are essentially entirely coastal and therefore
more dependent upon coastal and marine resources. Recognition of this
special vulnerability in Agenda 21 of the UN Conference on Environment
and Development (UNCED) led to the adoption in 1994 of the Barbados Programme
of Action on the Sustainable Development of Small Island States.
| Jellyfish in the Black Sea |
|
The effect of a jellyfish invasion on the Black Sea is one of the
best documented examples of the far reaching economic and ecological
consequences that can follow the introduction of an alien species
into an environment favouring its almost unlimited expansion.
Mnemiopsis leidyi, a comb jellyfish, originates on the eastern
seaboards of both North and South America. It abounds in ports and
harbours, and is pumped in ballast water into cargo ships. These
jellyfish can live for 3-4 weeks without food, by reducing the size
of their bodies, so they can easily survive the 20-day voyage to
the Black Sea. They were first found in the Black Sea, off the south-east
Crimea, in 1982.
Damaging human activities - including overfishing, pollution, water
extraction and barrages on rivers running into the sea - had set
the stage for its entrance. Overfishing and eutrophication seem
to have combined to remove top predators such as turbot, bluefish
and monk seals and to cut the numbers of plankton-eating fish severely,
opening up a niche for the jellyfish. Meanwhile plankton proliferated.
Hermaphroditic and self-fertilizing, the numbers of jellyfish exploded
from 1988 onwards. The populations of plankton crashed as the invaders
ate them. Fish stocks collapsed, partly because the jellyfish deprived
them of their food and ate their eggs and larvae. The catch of the
former states of the Soviet Union plummeted from 250 000 to 30 000
tonnes a year, and it was much the same story in Turkey. At least
US$300 million was lost in falling fishery revenues between the
mid-1980s and the early 1990s, with grave economic and social consequences.
Fishing vessels were put up for sale, and fishermen abandoned the
sea.
|
| Source: GESAMP 2001b |
|