|
As a result of habitat conversion and loss, 31 of the 178 ecoregions
in the region are in a critical state of conservation, 51 are endangered
and 55 are vulnerable (Dinerstein and others 1995). Most endangered ecoregions
are found in the northern and central Andes, Central America, the steppe
and winter rainfall areas of the southern cone, the Cerrado and other
dry forests south of the Amazon basin, and the Caribbean (Dinerstein and
others 1995). Myers and others (2000) located 7 of the world's 25 hot
spots (where exceptional concentrations of endemic species are undergoing
exceptional loss of habitat) in the region.
The Neotropics possess 6 of the 12 countries in the world where globally
threatened bird species are concentrated, with Brazil and Colombia having
the highest numbers in this category (BirdLife International 2000). Together,
Brazil, Colombia, Peru and Mexico account for more than 75 per cent of
threatened bird species in the Americas (BirdLife International 2000).
Cloud forests and other humid montane forests have
been identified as one of the most threatened habitat types in the region.
They are found where persistent cloud cover is in contact with the mountainside,
at altitudes of 1 000-3 000 metres and play a critical role in the provision
of clean water supplies to human populations in the lowlands. Humid montane
forests also harbour the wild relatives and gene pools of many New World
crops, including potatoes, maize and beans (Debouck and Libros Ferla 1995).
The principal pressures on cloud forests are clearance for subsistence
and commercial agriculture by rural communities, and in some regions for
plantations of narcotics. Human population growth and poverty drive these
processes but the construction of roads and increased links to commercial
markets has also stimulated the production of cash crops. Other major
pressures include deforestation for cattle ranching, which in the past
has often been supported by government policies.
Lowland tropical rainforests have been the focus of particular conservation
concern, being the habitat with the highest species richness and with
continuing conversion of major areas to other land uses. The Brazilian
Amazon is the largest tropical rainforest in the world, which once had
a forested area of 4 million km2. By 1998, 86.3 per cent of
this area remained, with 377 200 km2 cleared during the preceding
20 years (Fearnside 1999). The mean rate of forest clearing accelerated
in the 1990s, and the total area affected by fragmentation, clearing and
edge effects is now estimated to comprise one-third of the Brazilian Amazon
(Laurance 1998).
Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon is driven by several processes.
A major pressure is the ten-fold population growth in the region since
1960 (Goodman and Hall 1990). In addition, industrial logging and mining
and their associated networks of roads, which make accessible new areas
of forest to colonizers and ranchers, have been major factors in deforestation.
Some 6 per cent of the region falls within the strictly protected category.
Major efforts have been made in the field of timber certification and
forest preservation to reverse the loss of biodiversity (UNEP-ECLAC 2001).
Human-ignited fires have also become widespread, especially in logged
and fragmented areas (Laurance 1998).
The forests of eastern coastal Brazil are considered among the most endangered
habitats on earth and have been given highest priority for biodiversity
conservation (Bibby and others 1992). They contain 7 000 endemic plants
and 779 endemic vertebrates - 2.7 and 2.1 per cent of the global total,
respectively (Myers and others 2000). In the Bahia region, only 0.4 per
cent of continuous forest cover remains of the original forest area of
215 436 km2 (Mendonça and others 1994). Threats arise from
coastal development and uncontrolled logging, agriculture and charcoal
production.
Overall, more than 10 per cent of the region is currently protected (see
graphic below). In addition, the attractiveness of the cloud forests and
recognition of their values by concerned individuals has led to the creation
of many private forest reserves in the region, often linked to scientific
research programmes and ecotourism ventures. A related trend in the 1990s
has been the creation of community-managed montane forest reserves.
A new approach to promoting montane forest conservation in the region
is to compensate forest owners for the environmental services their forests
provide to society, often financed by the collection of a small surcharge
on the users of water originating in the forests. Such schemes are being
considered in several Latin American countries and have been tested in
Costa Rica (Campos and Calvo 2000). Many forest conservation initiatives
have been developed in the Amazon, including land-use planning, the establishment
of protected areas linked by corridors and extractive and Amerindian reserves.
The largest of these is the Pilot Programme to Conserve the Brazilian
Rainforest, with support from the G-7 nations. However, further major
infrastructure, industrial agriculture, mining and logging projects are
currently planned for the Amazon (Laurance and others 2001).
The CBD has played an important role in terms of the
response to biodiversity loss. While some countries have incorporated the
CBD's objectives in general legislation, others have done so by means of
sectoral laws. The former group includes Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Peru
and Venezuela. For example, Brazil established a National Programme on Biological
Diversity in 1994 together with an accompanying project for the conservation
and sustainable use of Brazilian biological diversity (PROBIO), identifying
priority conservation areas and actions through a series of assessments.
In Peru, the Law for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological
Diversity, which covers most CBD commitments, entered into force in 1997.
It is expected that the nine Caribbean countries now preparing national
strategies on biodiversity will implement the CBD by means of legislation,
development of institutional mechanisms and by providing adequate resources
(UNEP 2000). Countries that are modifying their sectoral laws include Cuba,
Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua and Panama. However, legislation for the implementation
of the CBD has often been developed without reference to other biodiversityrelated
conventions such as CITES, the Convention on Migratory Species and Ramsar.
National funding programmes such as the Mexican Fund for Nature Conservation
have been established as part of national efforts to implement the CBD.
Additional sources of funding include organizations such as the World
Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, together with other international
agencies, NGOs and bilateral cooperation agencies.
Between 1988 and 1999, the World Bank Group approved 74 biodiversity
projects in the region which were declared consistent with the goals and
objectives of the CBD. A substantial amount (more than US$700 million)
has been distributed among regional efforts to conserve biodiversity,
especially since 1995. As expected, most of the resources went to the
largest countries. Brazil alone received 56 per cent of the total but
this benefit has not been equally distributed among ecosystems, the majority
going to the Amazon and Atlantic rainforests.
|