|
Only 5 per cent of the land area of Europe is currently designated as
a protected area (see graphic). The major policy instruments relating
to habitat protection are Agenda 2000, Natura 2000, the Emerald Network
and the Pan-European Ecological Network. With these it is planned to create
a coherent European ecological network of natural and semi-natural habitats
and provide or restore corridors between existing protected areas throughout
the region.
Agenda 2000 is an action programme designed to strengthen
EU policies. The programme will promote new interrelationships between rural
areas and biodiversity, involving agri-environmental measures, structural
funds, Less Favoured Area measures, afforestation measures, and so on.
In the EU, the Natura 2000 Network (Hoffmann 2000) is expected to become
operational within a few years, with more than 10 per cent of EU territory
designated for nature conservation purposes. For non- EU countries a less
binding programme (the Emerald Network) was set up recently under the
Bern Convention. Some eastern European countries have already established
Natura 2000 networks.
These developments are key elements in Europe’s contribution to the CBD.
EU strategy aims to complement biodiversity initiatives at the national
level through a series of action plans to integrate biodiversity into
other sectoral policies and programmes. Similarly, national biodiversity
action plans are being developed throughout much of Europe.
Countries in Central and Eastern Europe still possess a wealth of well-preserved
landscapes, ecosystems and species that are rare or already extinct in
Western Europe. Most protected areas in these areas had been designated
by the end of the l970s, often surrounded by large buffer zones and connected
by habitat corridors linking sites. However, with economic transition,
the system of nature protection came under intense pressure as state financing
declined and it is now in jeopardy (see box).
| Financial support for biodiversity in Central
and Eastern Europe |
| Economic transition in Eastern Europe has caused biodiversity funding
to dry up. In Bulgaria, for example, domestic financing collapsed
in the mid-1990s and up to 90 per cent of all biodiversity financing
now comes from foreign sources — the EU and bilateral funds, with
€4-6 million provided annually by the Netherlands alone; Germany and
Switzerland are also major contributors. However, foreign aid rarely
exceeds 10-15 per cent of the required funding. Some popular parks
in Central Europe are partially financed by park fees but these never
cover more than 50 per cent of the costs of park maintenance (OECD
1999). |
|