For the sake of brevity, the term "Technology Transfer" as used throughout
the Report includes the related concepts of "Technology Cooperation"
and "Technology Diffusion". Using this terminology, the Report describes
what is needed in connection with technology transfer to address climate change;
examines the adequacy of current initiatives in technology transfer in support
of the Convention, and places the discussion in the context of the sustainable
development agenda and the problem of development choices.
There is, however, no simple definition of a "sustainable development agenda"
for developing countries. Sustainable development is a context-driven concept
and each society may define it differently. Technologies that may be suitable
in each of such contexts may differ considerably. This makes it important to
ensure that transferred technologies meet local needs and priorities, thus increasing
the likelihood that they will be effective. And although local needs and priorities
may be challenging to ascertain by the consensus of the relevant stakeholders,
transferring technologies that are to meet such needs without causing a huge
economic burden to the people is even more complicated.
A special emphasis in the Report is on the direct role of governments in technology
transfer and their role in creating favourable conditions for the development
of a market for climate change-related goods, technologies and services (IPCC,
1996), and for taking actions. The Report stresses that current efforts and
established processes of technology transfer will not be sufficient to meet
this challenge, and concludes that additional actions are needed for the transfer
of mitigation and adaptation technologies. Especially for technologies that
will not yet diffuse commercially, it is important to go further than improving
market performance. Extra efforts to enact policies that lower costs and stimulate
demand will be needed to realise environmental benefits that are not adequately
produced otherwise. Integrating human skills, organisational development and
information networks is a key to effective technology transfer.
The Report looks at technology transfer as the result of many day-to-day decisions,
and identifies the stakeholders who participate in the decision-making process
regarding strategy, investment, international trade, market opportunities, etc.
It also identifies social, economic, political, legal, and technological factors
that influence technology transfer. Cultural preferences, consumers' awareness,
social values, lifestyles, corruption, competition, etc. are reflected in technology
transfer as well. Although the report contains a comprehensive list of publications
dealing with the conceptual aspects of technology transfer, it emphasises actual
case studies, listed in Annex 1-1, to illustrate the practical
aspects of managing technological change to address global climate change concerns.
The key words here are management, technology, climate and change for sustainable
development.
The Report elaborates on what governments can do to facilitate technology transfer
in support of the Climate Change Convention, taking into consideration their stage
of development and specific sectors. The Report addresses effectiveness criteria
as being subjective and dependent on perspectives and indicators on greenhouse
gas abatement, economic sustainability, social acceptability, and environmental
sustainability. Annex 1-2 articulates this matter further.
It is important at the outset to distinguish between technologies for mitigation
and adaptation to climate change. In simple words, mitigation focuses on slowing
climate change, whereas adaptation deals with the effects of climate change.
The general question the Report attempts to address is how can "technology
transfer", or rather the management of technological change, encourage
development that is climate friendly (mitigation) and climate responsive (adaptation),
taking into account the need to adjust to the effects of climate change.
Throughout this Report reference is made to Environmentally Sound (or Sounder)
Technologies (ESTs), that is: "technologies which protect the environment,
are less polluting, use all resources in a more sustainable manner, recycle
more of their wastes and products, handle residual wastes in a more acceptable
manner than the technologies for which they were substitutes, and are compatible
with nationally determined socio-economic, cultural and environmental priorities.
The term encompasses hard and soft technologies (United Nations, 1993)."
"Examples of soft technologies include capacity building, information networks,
training and research, while examples of hard technologies include equipment
and products to control, reduce or prevent anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse
gases in the energy, transportation, forestry, agriculture, industry and waste
management sectors, to enhance removals by sinks and to facilitate adaptation
(van Berkel and Arkesteijn, 1998)."
In this Report ESTs imply both mitigation and adaptation technologies. It is worth
noting that technologies, which address climate change, that is, which are climate
friendly and climate responsive, are not necessarily always environmentally sound.
For instance, technologies for large hydroelectric plants are climate friendly
but could affect the environment where they are deployed. Conversely, the catalytic
processing of exhaust gases from automobile tail pipes may be environmentally
sound but may not be climate friendly. However, in this Report it is assumed that
both mitigation and adaptation technologies will be applied in such a way that
they are environmentally sound. A finer qualification on equating climate-responsive
with adaptation is the possibility that adaptation technologies may take advantage
of climate change, for instance to increase agricultural productivity in specific
instances.
