Other reports in this collection
(continued...)
Climatic risks
Climatic risks will be highly dependent on the expected pattern of time variability
for weather variables. Increasing temperatures will promote the development
rate of all winter crops, which therefore will face extreme events (cold spells)
at a later stage (i.e., when they are more sensitive). Consequences depend as
a whole on the probabilities of such extreme events and a higher intra-annual
variability of minimum temperatures-yielding a higher probability of crop failure
from frost damage. The same problem arises with winter cereals, which face extreme
temperature maxima in early summer during the grain-filling period. Recent investigations
show that the probabilities of extreme temperatures increase under all climate
scenarios (CLAIRE, 1996) and that thermal shocks on poorly adapted genotypes
lead to losses in grain yield and quality.
Higher temperatures in summer should not be a real challenge to summer crops
(except spring cereals, if subjected to elevated temperatures during the grain-filling
period) because they are more resilient than winter crops. Drought could be
a major concern in the future, however, particularly in the Mediterranean zone
and in central Europe. This is a genuinely complex problem; GCM-based scenarios
do not agree on the magnitude of changes in space of at least one component
of the water budget (precipitation), and changes in another component-potential
evapotranspiration (PET)-are extremely dependent on calculation methods. Le
Hou�rou (1995) states that a 1�C increase in air temperature will induce 37
mm more PET south of 40�N (ECRASE, 1996)-an enormous 60% increase in PET in
southern European countries. If simulated changes of -10% to -20% in summer
precipitation for western, southern, and central Europe are reliable, fully
irrigated crops may become even larger competitors to domestic and industrial
users for water resources stored in aquifers and rivers (a 20% reduction represents
a significant loss in currently moist areas).
Adaptive responses
Adaptive responses could be facilitated by increased knowledge of weather patterns and climate-related variability through the use of climate forecast information.
To abate the shortening effect of temperatures on crop cycles, changed sowing dates and later-maturing genotypes could be used whatever the type of crop. This approach, however, may cause a problem with winter cereals whose cycle length often is linked with cold temperature requirements (vernalization) that may be not completely fulfilled during warmer winters. Later-maturing crops also should face climatic risks in the early summer. On the other hand, the sowing dates of winter crops cannot be postponed to early fall because of the much higher probability of experiencing low temperatures at a sensitive stage and because of the cost of fungal disease control during periods in the early fall.
For summer crops, using earlier sowing dates or longer-maturing varieties would counteract the detrimental effects of climate change in all cases-as was demonstrated for sunflowers throughout Europe in CLAIRE (1996), for spring wheat in Finland in Saarikko and Carter (1996), and for maize in Spain in CLAIRE (1996). Choosing adequate sowing dates also could help to synchronize full canopy development and maximum radiation availability on maize-type crops in northern European regions (Del�colle et al., 1996), which would enhance final production. Similarly, earlier sowing dates would allow the crop to develop during periods of lower PET demand, implying an improvement in global water-use efficiency and a reduction in irrigation demand-as simulated in Spain by CLAIRE (1996).
|
Other reports in this collection |
|